Ann arbor staging system pdf

The ann arbor staging system is the widely used staging system for most subtypes of nonhodgkin lymphoma nhl, including lymphoblastic lymphoma. Mar 10, 2020 the ann arbor staging system has commonly been used for patients with nonhodgkin lymphoma nhl. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and. It has roughly the same function as tnm staging in solid tumors the stage depends on both the place where the malignant tissue is. Staging provides important information for treatment planning. It was initially developed for hodgkins, but has some use in nhl.

Jan 01, 2020 the lugano classification system further modified staging by incorporating positron emission tomographycomputed tomography petct results to determine the staging of the lymphoma table 3 19. The cotswolds modification maintains the original 4stage clinical and pathologic staging framework of the ann arbor staging system but also. Clinical data is added based on a absence or b presence of associated symptomse. Us, ct, and mr imaging in lymphoma lymphoma may be unifocal, multifo. However, it does not reflect other important prognostic factors such as bulky disease or multiple sites of involvement. Many lymphoma staging systems for both hodgkin lymphoma and nonhodgkin lymphoma have been developed the most widely used currently is the lugano staging classification, which also separately defines criteria for response to treatment assessed by petct or by ct alone. A staging system is a way for the cancer care team to sum up the extent of a cancers spread. Ann arbor staging is the staging system for lymphomas, both in hodgkins lymphoma formerly designated hodgkins disease and nonhodgkin lymphoma. Whoreal classification nodular lymphocytepredominant hl. This included lymph node biopsy and in some cases, biopsy of the bone marrow.

Different staging systems the gastrointestinal tract is the most common primary extranodal site for diffuse large bcell lymphoma dlbcl. The ann arbor staging classification was used to classify the extent of disease. The purpose of systems planning is to coordinate and plan for the development and maintenance of city systems. The ann arbor staging system is used to develop rational treatment strategies and is recommended for all nonhodgkins lymphomas table 3 8 this system is based on the number and location of nodal and extranodal regions and takes symptoms into account 8. The cotswold revision of the ann arbor staging classification is used for hodgkin lymphoma. Stage iv involvement of bone marrow andor central nervous system. The stages are described by roman numerals i through iv 14. The tnm classification is not used for staging hodgkin lymphomas because the site of origin of the tumor is often unclear and there is no way to differentiate among t, n, and m. However, the use of the ann arbor staging system for non. For the ann arbor system, clinical staging includes all of the noninvasive procedures. Similarly, the most recent update, the lugano classification, recently reported by. Staging summary of changes ajcc 2018 ann arbor staging cotswold modification updated to the lugano classification next slide symptoms eliminated for nhl, kept for hl x subscript x subscript for bulk eliminated, diameter of largest mass must be recorded stage iii e lesion eliminated from stage iii, any e involvement with nodal disease above and below. The designation x for bulky disease is no longer necessary.

In 2015, the national comprehensive cancer network nccn adopted this system. Ann arbor staging further classifies patients with lymphoma into a or b categories. This staging system is based on the locations, number of involved sites, and presence or absence of systemic symptoms table 27. A comparison of clinical staging using the lugano versus. Hodgkin lymphoma staging leukemia and lymphoma society. The ann arbor staging classification table 763, developed in 1971, is a four stage system formulated to provide prognostic information and to guide therapeutic. The traditional staging for hodgkin lymphoma and nonhodgkin lymphoma was initially presented at the ann arbor symposium on staging of hodgkin lymphoma, april, 1971.

Above illustration adapted from favrille patient education material. Vp staging is ann arbors leading home staging company. Is a staging system for lymphomas, both in nonhodgkin lymphoma and in hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management. The staging system used for hodgkin lymphoma is the lugano classification, which is based on the older ann arbor system. Lugano staging classification radiology reference article. This staging system is used for most forms of cancer, except brain tumors and hematological malignancies. The first system widely utilized for staging nonhodgkin lymphomas was actually developed for staging hodgkin disease and is referred to as the ann arbor staging system. A2 home staging works with homeowners and realtors in ann arbor and washtenaw county to transform vacant or occupied homes. Nonhodgkin lymphoma stages american cancer society. Ann arbor staging system definition of ann arbor staging. Paris staging system for primary gastrointestinal lymphomas. The ann arbor staging system, developed for and routinely used in nodal nonhodgkins lymphoma, is not optimal for documentation of the specific relevant features of primary extranodal lymphoma in the gastrointestinal tract.

Cancer staging can be divided into a clinical stage and a pathologic stage. Imaging for diagnosis, staging and response assessment of. Vp staging works with the ann arbor areas leading realtors, remodelers, and developers in creating homes and models that delight the eye and the checkbook. The lugano classification system further modified staging by incorporating positron emission tomographycomputed tomography petct results to determine the staging of the lymphoma table 3 19. Our data revealed a high concordance rate between the lugano and ann arbor staging system in japanese patients with hl. Stage iv denotes one or more extranodal sites not contiguous with lymph nodes. The ann arbor staging system was the landmark lymphoma staging classification system for both hodgkin lymphoma and nonhodgkin lymphoma it is named after the town of ann arbor in the us state of michigan where the committee on hodgkins disease staging classification met in 1971 to agree on it. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response. However, recognition that the ann arbor system does not subdivide some types of. The ann arbor staging system originally developed for the staging of hodgkin lymphoma has been extended to nonhodgkin lymphoid malignancies. Lugano, and ann arbor staging systems in patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma pgl. However, using the ann arbor staging system aass, a routine lymphoma staging system, most enktl patients are categorized as early stage, which is inconsistent with their poor survival 1. Citation classics pdf, current contentsclinical practice 1983. The definition of these stages can be found in the ajcc cancer staging manual 7th edition or union for international cancer control uicc staging manual.

Imaging for staging and response assessment in lymphoma. The world health organization whorevised europeanamerican lymphoma real classification and the cotswolds modified ann arbor staging system for hodgkin lymphoma hl are provided below, as well as the risk stratification for hl. Ann arbor staging system radiology reference article. Ann arbor staging is the staging system for lymphoma s, both in hodgkins lymphoma previously called hodgkins disease and nonhodgkin lymphoma abbreviated nhl. In planning for the development and maintenance of city systems, the systems planning unit relies on the following five principles to best serve the residents of ann arbor. Staging is based on the number and location of nodal stations. The lugano classification includes an e suffix for lymphoma with either localized extralymphatic presentations stage ie or by contiguous spread from nodal disease stage iie. Ann arbor staging a system for staging hodgkin lymphoma hl and nonhodgkin lymphoma nhl and guiding therapy. Oct 16, 2019 the staging system for hodgkin lymphoma is the ann arbor system with cotswald modifications and is based on imaging, whereas the nonhodgkin staging system is the st. What is the lugano modification of the ann arbor staging.

Limitations of ann arbor and more recent lugano classification. Revised international pediatric nonhodgkin lymphoma. Fdgpetct standard staging for fdgavid lymphomas response assessment in fdgavid subtypes using the 5point scale progressive disease evaluation ppd progression of single site defines progression. Local disease on one side of the diaphragm is stage iii, on both sides of diaphragm is stage iii. The ann arbor staging system is commonly used for hodgkins lymphoma patients. Although originally developed for staging patients with hodgkin disease, the ann arbor staging system provides the basis for anatomic staging in non. A modified ann arbor staging system is recommended. Ann arbor staging is the staging system for lymphomas, both in hodgkins lymphoma formerly designated hodgkins disease and nonhodgkin lymphoma abbreviated nhl. Pdf due to lack of awareness among health professionals, lymphoma is often misdiagnosed. Patients with nonhodgkin lymphoma are assigned an anatomic stage using the ann arbor system. The cancer staging system is used to decide the treatment modality, and also used for prognostic predictions. Pdf presentation, staging and diagnosis of lymphoma.

This system is based on the number and location of nodal and extranodal regions and takes symptoms into account 8. The first such system in lymphoma was a three stage classification published by peters in 1950 2 and was followed by the rye classification of 1966 3, and then the ann arbor classification of 1971 4, which has remained. This staging system is known as the lugano modification of the ann arbor staging system. B with symptoms including unexplained weight loss 10% in 6 months prior to diagnosis, unexplained fever, and drenching night sweats. A staging system is a way for members of a cancer care team to sum up the extent of a cancers spread. The ann arbor staging system was the landmark lymphoma staging classification system for both hodgkin lymphoma and nonhodgkin lymphoma.

However, there is no consensus on the most appropriate staging system for intestinal dlbcl. Stage iv marginal zone bcell lymphoma prognostic factors. Staging systems and prognosis assessment staging procedures define the anatomic extent of disease and influence choice of therapy. Revised international pediatric nonhodgkin lymphoma staging. Home staging services and solutions showcase your home to sell. Aug 11, 2014 historical series and prospective clinical trials have used the ann arbor staging system 5 to select patients and report outcomes.

Protocol for the examination of specimens from patients. Ann arbor staging definition of ann arbor staging by. The ann arbor staging system is widely used for anatomic staging of lymphoma, both hodgkin and nonhodgkin lymphomas. What is the ann arbor staging system for diffuse large cell lymphoma. A proposal for a new staging system for extranodal natural. The system is divided into four stages and is based on where the disease is located in the body. The original ann arbor staging system reported by lister et al 17 was designed without input from the pediatric oncology community and did not reference specific pediatric nhl disease entities or clinical patterns. Cyclophosphamide is indicated for the treatment of. Dec 10, 2019 the world health organization whorevised europeanamerican lymphoma real classification and the cotswolds modified ann arbor staging system for hodgkin lymphoma hl are provided below, as well as the risk stratification for hl. Doctors use physical examinations, imaging tests, blood test and, sometimes, bone marrow tests to determine the extent of the disease.

What is the cotswolds modification of ann arbor staging system for. The harrells cindex and integrated brier score ibs of the nri for os prediction demonstrated a better performance than that of the ann arbor staging system, ipi, kpi, and pink. Staging is used to define the anatomic distribution of the disease for purposes of prognosis and treatment planning. The ann arbor staging system continues to be in use in dlbcl.

Mar 10, 2017 is a staging system for lymphomas, both in nonhodgkin lymphoma and in hodgkin lymphoma. The ann arbor staging classification table 763, developed in 1971, is a fourstage system formulated to provide prognostic information and to guide therapeutic decisions. Because of its low diagnostic value, routine bone marrow examination might be unnecessary for staging when fdg. Many lymphoma staging systems for both hodgkin lymphoma and nonhodgkin lymphoma have been developed the most widely used currently is the lugano staging classification, which also separately defines criteria for response to treatment assessed by petct or by ct alone patients having undergone immunomodulatory therapy may also be assessed by a. A change from the cotswold modification of the ann arbor staging system, e lesions do not apply to patients with stage iii nodal disease. We evaluated the utility of the modified ann arbor system. All patients should have an ann arbor stage assigned. The classification system reflects changes to the cotswoldsmodified ann arbor classification made in 2011. Tnm staging system may be superior to lugano and ann arbor. The ghsg definition of nodal site differs from the ann arbor system in that the infraclavicular region is included with the ipsilateral cervical supraclavicular, the bilateral hila are included with the mediastinum, and the abdomen is divided into 2. The cotswold modification of the ann arbor staging system used in ajcc 6th and 7th editions has been updated to the lugano classification. Staging for hodgkin lymphoma is based on the ann arbor staging system. Jude classification by murphy or the more recent revised international pediatric nonhodgkin lymphoma staging system ipnhlss. Vp staging is ann arbor s leading home staging company.

It has roughly the same function as tnm staging in solid tumors. This system provides limited prognostic information, but is of use in determining therapeutic management. The ann arbor staging system is the most common system used for classifying all subtypes of nhl. Ann arbor staging classification for hodgkin lymphomaa pdq c. The current staging system for nhl in adults is known as the lugano classification, which is based on the older ann arbor system. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and. The ann arbor staging system is used to develop rational treatment strategies and is recommended for all nonhodgkins lymphomas table 3 8. The ann arbor staging system, originally designed for hodgkin disease, is traditionally used to assess the extent of disease involvement in. Ann arbor staging an overview sciencedirect topics. How does the ann arbor staging system classify nhlbcell.

Ann arbor staging classification for hodgkin lymphomaa pdq cancer information summaries. Since 2009, we have helped hundreds of homeowners depersonalize, declutter and accentuate the most striking features of their homes. The ann arbor system table 1 was initially devised for use in hodgkins lymphoma but was later adapted for use in nonhodgkins lymphoma. Whether the affected lymph nodes are above, below or on both sides of the diaphragm the large, domeshaped muscle under the ribcage that separates the chest from the abdomen. Several modifications and alternatives have been proposed. It has also been used for the treatment of nhl, including mzl. But their nodal sites differ from ann arbor system. Spd eliminated for progression spleen evaluation quantified. Jun 20, 2015 limitations of ann arbor and more recent lugano classification.

The use of standardized criteria for staging and response assessment is important for making accurate treatment decisions and for determining the direction of further research. No longer indicated for the routine staging of hl and most dlbcl. Validation of nomogramrevised risk index and comparison. Now, stage is only one component of factors in prognostic indices increasingly used for pretreatment risk stratification and selection of therapy. In the tnm tumor, node, metastasis system, clinical stage and pathologic stage are denoted by a small c or p before the stage e.

84 323 1230 593 1531 203 1081 431 142 1493 22 343 736 916 1371 1305 1524 675 1196 232 1323 106 1101 521 449 1104 1015 894 1014 19 1152